- Smaller supplier perceiving the implementation costs to be too high
- Many in the produce industry believe their internal systems are “good enough”
Monday, August 13, 2018
It has been said that everything old is new again. This certainly rings true for the produce industry as 2018 has already seen two significant outbreaks E.coli 0157:H7 in Romaine Lettuce, bringing us full circle back to similar events with E.coli in spinach in 2006.
For many of us, these recent outbreaks are disheartening, because we have actively working on produce traceability solutions since 2007. That is when leading retailers, growers, and the PMA, CPMA, and United Fresh formed the task force that led to the Produce Traceability Initiative (PTI). The PTI originally had ambitions that every case of produce would have traceability labels by 2012, yet in 2018 best estimates are that approximately half of produce cases in the US have GS1 128 traceability labels on them. Originally driven primarily by Walmart’s request for produce suppliers to have traceability labels beginning in January of 2014, we are now seeing increased traceability labeling requirements by large restaurant chains wanting to protect their customers and brands.
So why don’t we have better traceability in 2018? The short answer is we do, but if 50% of the product is labeled we still have a ways to go. According to Angela Fernandez, Vice President of GS1 US Retail Grocery and Food Service Industries, in a guest article published by Southwest Produce Weekly it comes down to two things:
The good news is that scalable traceability systems are available today, some at costs of under $10,000, some higher depending on the needs and size of the grower. The bigger challenge is that while internal systems may be good enough for the grower, they don’t provide the visibility needed across the supply chain.
In my opinion, what we have learned is as long as traceability is voluntary we will continue to see large foodborne illness outbreaks, which unfortunately means additional deaths and illness. On May 24th nine consumer groups sent a letter to the FDA Commissioner, Scott Gottlieb, urging the FDA to propose requirements for “comprehensive and rapid traceability of produce” within six months. With the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's (CFIA) recent release of the Safe Food for Canadians Regulations (SFCR) that include traceability requirements, it is inevitable that food traceability in the US will also be moving from voluntary to a federal requirement in the next few years. In addition to protecting consumers, this should help farmers limit the scope and cost when their product is implicated in a foodborne illness outbreak.
About the author Todd Baggett:
Todd is the President and CEO of RedLine Solutions; a company that provides produce traceability and inventory solutions. He is the author of “Produce Traceability for Dummies”, and has served as the Co-Chair of the PTI Technical Working Group since 2011.
© RedLine Solutions Inc. 2018. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to RedLine Solutions and there is the inclusion of a link to www.traceabilitynerd.com. All rights reserved. RedLine Solutions & RedLine Cooler names and logos, referred to in this document, are trademarks of RedLine Solutions Inc.
By Todd Baggett President , Redline Solutions The FDA Final Rule on FSMA Section 204 published November 2022 require s sup...
On Nov. 15 the FDA released the Final Rule on FSMA Section 204, which contains the long-awaited regulations on record keeping for products o...
Author: Todd Baggett - CEO of RedLine Solutions We are honored to have received the Innovation Award for Ivanti ’s 2020 Supply Chain Partn...
Moving to the Cloud is a Smart Move for Many Reasons America’s mainstream business move to the Cloud has been growing steadily over the pa...